Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SWMCX
FSMAX vs SWMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SWMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Schwab ® US Mid-Cap Index
Price$72.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
FSMAX vs SWMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SWMCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SWMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. SWMCX (2.16B). SWMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: SWMCX (1.34) vs FSMAX (0.47). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SWMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SWMCX (8 years). SWMCX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SWMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and SWMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX (15.33) and SWMCX (15.13) have marching annual gain over last year. SWMCX return over 5 years is better than : 73.51 vs. FSMAX (61.91).
| FSMAX | SWMCX | FSMAX / SWMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.195 | 8.549 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2.16B | 1,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.34 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.33 | 15.13 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.73 | 44.36 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.91 | 73.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers