Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$30.06
Change+$0.31 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets745.57M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. SMFCX (746M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. SMFCX (1.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.55 vs. SMFCX (9.75).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.654 | 13.691 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 746M | 5,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | 1.04 | 471% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.94 | 35.59 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.55 | 9.75 | 334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | 80.72 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement