Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$29.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.25M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. SMFCX (750M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. SMFCX (8.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. SMFCX (16.90).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | 12.519 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 750M | 5,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | 8.02 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 48.31 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | 16.90 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | 83.86 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement