Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFCX
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$20.81
Change-$9.48 (-31.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets672.25M
FSMAX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. SMFCX (672M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: FSMAX (0.56) vs SMFCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFCX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. SMFCX (-24.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. SMFCX (-28.76).
| FSMAX | SMFCX | FSMAX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | -0.526 | -580% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 672M | 6,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | -24.46 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | -5.71 | -842% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -28.76 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | 60.70 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement