Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SMFAX
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SMFAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.71
Change-$0.26 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$25.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets687.78M
FSMAX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SMFAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. SMFAX (688M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: FSMAX (0.43) vs SMFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: FSMAX (0) vs SMFAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. SMFAX (-16.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.24 vs. SMFAX (-16.60).
| FSMAX | SMFAX | FSMAX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.303 | -14.494 | -92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 688M | 5,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | -16.65 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.63 | 16.23 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.24 | -16.60 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.30 | 61.00 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers