Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs POAGX
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs POAGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$53.88
Change-$0.17 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. POAGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. POAGX (6.63B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than POAGX: FSMAX (0.44) vs POAGX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than POAGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs POAGX (21 years). POAGX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. POAGX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than POAGX: FSMAX (0) vs POAGX (2000). POAGX (12.96) and FSMAX (12.72) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. POAGX (6.03).
| FSMAX | POAGX | FSMAX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | 22.260 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 6.63B | 624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.02 | 2,027% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | 12.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 42.34 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | 6.03 | 810% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | 65.00 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement