Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$15.01
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NMPAX (2.59B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.27) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.50 vs. NMPAX (2.43). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.13 vs. NMPAX (12.21).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.33 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 3.683 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 2.59B | 1,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.27 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.50 | 2.43 | 883% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.89 | 14.65 | 388% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.13 | 12.21 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.70 | 8.70 | 1,168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers