Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$88.99
Change-$1.54 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$13.65
Change-$0.62 (-4.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NMPAX (2.36B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.41) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. NMPAX (-7.87). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.48 vs. NMPAX (5.57).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.34 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.080 | -5.711 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 2.36B | 1,591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.41 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | -7.87 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.57 | 3.14 | 1,516% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.48 | 5.57 | 1,085% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.64 | -9.80 | -680% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers