Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.09
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.51
Change+$0.10 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. NMPAX (2.58B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.33) vs FSMAX (0.47). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. NMPAX (1.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. NMPAX (15.94).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.34 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 0.230 | 2,018% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2.58B | 1,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.33 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 1.34 | 1,385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 15.05 | 363% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 15.94 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | -0.30 | -26,746% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement