Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$18.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NMGRX (2.03B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (17 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. NMGRX (-8.75). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.55 vs. NMGRX (-15.08).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.654 | 8.256 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 2.03B | 2,018% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | -8.75 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.94 | 24.26 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.55 | -15.08 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | 29.32 | 357% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement