Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$19.12
Change-$0.09 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NMGRX (2.11B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. NMGRX (3.80). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. NMGRX (-6.01).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.103 | 12.005 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 2.11B | 1,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 3.80 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 39.92 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.17 | -6.01 | -817% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.19 | 34.31 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers