Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.71
Change-$0.26 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Neuberger Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NMGCX (2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGCX (17 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. NMGCX (-15.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.24 vs. NMGCX (-29.70).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.303 | -12.551 | -106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 2B | 2,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | -15.65 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.63 | 11.96 | 565% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.24 | -29.70 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.30 | 5.93 | 1,994% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement