Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.68
Change-$2.68 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
Price$18.30
Change-$0.68 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. NMGAX (2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGAX (16 years). NMGAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. NMGAX (-2.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.70 vs. NMGAX (-6.54).
| FSMAX | NMGAX | FSMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.532 | 11.305 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 2B | 2,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | -2.45 | -304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.42 | 31.66 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.70 | -6.54 | -684% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.36 | 40.59 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement