Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$6.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets703.54M
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NMCCX (704M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMCCX (27 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. NMCCX (-18.59). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. NMCCX (-58.30).
| FSMAX | NMCCX | FSMAX / NMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | 6.221 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 704M | 5,881% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | -18.59 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 7.90 | 805% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | -58.30 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | -63.94 | -162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers