Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.39
Change-$0.53 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NMANX (2.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMANX (47 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. NMANX (-5.12). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. NMANX (-11.09).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 47 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.415 | 11.098 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 2.07B | 1,985% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | -5.12 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 32.87 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | -11.09 | -305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.92 | 36.99 | 322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement