Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMTX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
Neuberger Mid Cap Growth Tr
Price$14.96
Change-$4.60 (-23.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMTX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. NBMTX (1.99B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: FSMAX (0.56) vs NBMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMTX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMTX (32 years). NBMTX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. NBMTX (-17.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. NBMTX (-30.09).
| FSMAX | NBMTX | FSMAX / NBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | 2.116 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 1.99B | 2,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | -17.48 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 5.80 | 828% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -30.09 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | 37.33 | 421% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement