Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMLX
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMLX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.68
Change-$2.68 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inst
Price$18.32
Change-$0.68 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. NBMLX (2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMLX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NBMLX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMLX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMLX (19 years). NBMLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMLX: FSMAX (0) vs NBMLX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. NBMLX (-1.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.78 vs. NBMLX (-4.47).
| FSMAX | NBMLX | FSMAX / NBMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.69 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.69 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.598 | 11.661 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 2B | 2,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -1.95 | -347% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.30 | 33.37 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | -4.47 | -1,002% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.36 | 38.96 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement