Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.74
Change+$0.17 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
Neuberger Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$15.38
Change-$0.15 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NBMBX (2.06B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.57) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. NBMBX (-10.72). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. NBMBX (-26.69).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.867 | 5.126 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.06B | 1,949% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.86 | -10.72 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.22 | 12.45 | 484% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.65 | -26.69 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.70 | 31.16 | 503% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement