Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$18.36
Change-$0.53 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NBMBX (2.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. NBMBX (-5.56). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. NBMBX (-12.91).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.415 | 10.706 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 2.07B | 1,985% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | -5.56 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 31.28 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | -12.91 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.92 | 39.84 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers