Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$19.13
Change-$0.09 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NBMBX (2.11B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. NBMBX (3.99). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. NBMBX (-5.32).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | 12.112 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 2.11B | 1,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | 3.99 | 319% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 40.60 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | -5.32 | -917% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | 36.30 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers