Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MXNZX
FSMAX vs MXNZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MXNZX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Empower S&P Mid Cap 400® Index Instl
Price$8.54
Change+$0.07 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
FSMAX vs MXNZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MXNZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MXNZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. MXNZX (1.41B). MXNZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: MXNZX (3.52) vs FSMAX (0.47). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MXNZX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MXNZX (10 years). MXNZX (0.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MXNZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and MXNZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. MXNZX (2.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.91 vs. MXNZX (23.28).
| FSMAX | MXNZX | FSMAX / MXNZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.18 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.18 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.195 | 3.893 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 1.41B | 2,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 3.52 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.33 | 2.69 | 569% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.73 | 10.73 | 482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.91 | 23.28 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.12 | 10.76 | 801% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement