Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.15
Change-$0.39 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
Price$79.60
Change-$0.49 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.14M
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. MGPSX (9.14M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.56) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MGPSX (24 years). MGPSX (3.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 457.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. MGPSX (1.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. MGPSX (-19.30).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | 4.748 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 9.14M | 444,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 1.93 | 543% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 22.26 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -19.30 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | 52.76 | 298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement