Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LSHCX
FSMAX vs LSHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LSHCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$106.54
Change+$0.80 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$23.25
Change+$0.29 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.86M
FSMAX vs LSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LSHCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LSHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LSHCX (28.9M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LSHCX: FSMAX (0.57) vs LSHCX (0.18). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LSHCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LSHCX (19 years). LSHCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. LSHCX (6.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSHCX: FSMAX (0) vs LSHCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.99 vs. LSHCX (-32.35). LSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.87 vs. FSMAX (25.85).
| FSMAX | LSHCX | FSMAX / LSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.29 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.56 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.036 | 13.859 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 28.9M | 138,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.18 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.99 | -32.35 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.48 | 7.39 | 818% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.85 | 79.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.11 | 212.33 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement