Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F3
Price$36.47
Change-$1.11 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets709.65M
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LOMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. LOMGX (710M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (0.43) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LOMGX (9 years). LOMGX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. FSMAX (7.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. LOMGX (-1.16).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.78 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.415 | 18.624 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 710M | 5,775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 12.48 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 64.61 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | -1.16 | -2,925% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers