Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$106.54
Change+$0.80 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.72
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.14M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LMGCX (710M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.57) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (27 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.99 vs. LMGCX (-0.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.85 vs. LMGCX (-24.16).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.90 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.036 | 4.397 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 710M | 5,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.99 | -0.47 | -2,956% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.48 | 40.32 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.85 | -24.16 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.11 | 12.37 | 1,270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers