Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.74
Change+$0.17 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$27.67
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets716.01M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LMGAX (716M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.57) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGAX (30 years). LMGAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. LMGAX (7.88). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. LMGAX (-6.93).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.867 | 3.750 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 716M | 5,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.86 | 7.88 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.22 | 51.70 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.65 | -6.93 | -370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.70 | 66.19 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers