Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.15
Change-$0.39 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$26.05
Change-$0.97 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets687.25M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. LMGAX (687M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.56) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGAX (31 years). LMGAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. LMGAX (-5.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. LMGAX (-15.48).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.851 | -2.325 | -123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 687M | 5,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | -5.65 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.78 | 37.98 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | -15.48 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.53 | 63.43 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers