Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IRMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
Price$10.65
Change+$0.10 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IRMCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. IRMCX (1.02B). IRMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: IRMCX (0.90) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.50 vs. IRMCX (1.19). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.13 vs. IRMCX (2.82).
| FSMAX | IRMCX | FSMAX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.79 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | -3.865 | -260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.02B | 4,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.90 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.50 | 1.19 | 1,808% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.89 | 4.61 | 1,235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.13 | 2.82 | 2,100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.70 | -21.80 | -467% |