Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$28.44
Change-$2.25 (-7.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.89B
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and IGRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. IGRFX (3.89B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (0.43) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IGRFX (11 years). IGRFX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.33 vs. IGRFX (-10.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.03 vs. IGRFX (-28.38).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.125 | 3.021 | 368% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 3.89B | 1,055% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | -10.08 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.85 | 5.65 | 918% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.03 | -28.38 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.82 | 33.90 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement