Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IBCGX
FSMAX vs IBCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IBCGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
FSMAX vs IBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IBCGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. IBCGX (315M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IBCGX: FSMAX (0.44) vs IBCGX (0.22). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IBCGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IBCGX (17 years). IBCGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. IBCGX (4.00). FSMAX (0) and IBCGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. IBCGX (-34.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. IBCGX (-38.14).
| FSMAX | IBCGX | FSMAX / IBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.52 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.103 | -31.707 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 315M | 13,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.22 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | -34.27 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | -23.29 | -274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.17 | -38.14 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.19 | -47.67 | -219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers