Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$21.36
Change-$1.04 (-4.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets714.74M
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. HBMCX (715M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (0.56) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HBMCX (26 years). HBMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. HBMCX (-22.78). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. HBMCX (-50.46).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | 0.518 | 589% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 715M | 5,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | -22.78 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | -21.21 | -227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -50.46 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | -26.95 | -583% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers