Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.74
Change+$0.17 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$22.14
Change-$0.15 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets746.15M
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HBMCX (746M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (0.57) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HBMCX (26 years). HBMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. HBMCX (-17.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. HBMCX (-48.38).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.867 | 4.188 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 746M | 5,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.86 | -17.54 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.22 | -14.12 | -427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.65 | -48.38 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.70 | -25.19 | -622% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers