Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.68
Change-$2.68 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$21.21
Change-$0.62 (-2.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.93M
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. HBMCX (723M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HBMCX (26 years). HBMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. HBMCX (-20.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.78 vs. HBMCX (-42.62).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.598 | -17.560 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 723M | 5,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -20.91 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.30 | -13.61 | -392% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | -42.62 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.36 | -34.84 | -311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement