Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GTMUX
FSMAX vs GTMUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GTMUX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$22.57
Change-$1.81 (-7.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
FSMAX vs GTMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GTMUX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GTMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. GTMUX (1.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GTMUX: FSMAX (0.56) vs GTMUX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GTMUX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GTMUX (11 years). GTMUX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GTMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTMUX: FSMAX (0) vs GTMUX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. GTMUX (-11.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. GTMUX (-26.15).
| FSMAX | GTMUX | FSMAX / GTMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | 3.437 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 1.21B | 3,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | -11.46 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 7.48 | 643% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -26.15 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | 31.37 | 500% |