Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$24.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. GSWPX (1.36B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSWPX (8 years). GSWPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. GSWPX (-4.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. GSWPX (-14.75).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | -1.785 | -608% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 1.36B | 3,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | -4.95 | -257% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 28.30 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | -14.75 | -331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement