Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$22.58
Change-$1.80 (-7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. GSWPX (1.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.56) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSWPX (8 years). GSWPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. GSWPX (-11.42). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. GSWPX (-26.11).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | 3.483 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 1.21B | 3,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | -11.42 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 7.52 | 639% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -26.11 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement