Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSMGX
FSMAX vs GSMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.68
Change-$2.68 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.11
Change-$0.47 (-3.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
FSMAX vs GSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. GSMGX (1.35B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSMGX: FSMAX (0.43) vs GSMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSMGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSMGX (20 years). GSMGX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMGX: FSMAX (0) vs GSMGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. GSMGX (-8.97). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.70 vs. GSMGX (-31.17).
| FSMAX | GSMGX | FSMAX / GSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.03 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.532 | -3.157 | -365% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 1.35B | 3,076% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | -8.97 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.42 | 17.39 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.70 | -31.17 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.36 | -21.22 | -501% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement