Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSMCX
FSMAX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.09
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$38.11
Change+$0.22 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSMAX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSMCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and GSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. GSMCX (1.1B). GSMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: GSMCX (0.99) vs FSMAX (0.47). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSMCX (30 years). GSMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMAX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. GSMCX (6.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. GSMCX (35.78).
| FSMAX | GSMCX | FSMAX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 4.297 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 1.1B | 3,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.99 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 6.81 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 11.94 | 457% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 35.78 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | -0.21 | -38,776% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement