Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSMCX
FSMAX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$104.90
Change+$0.92 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$36.14
Change-$4.37 (-10.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
FSMAX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSMCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and GSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. GSMCX (1.09B). GSMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: GSMCX (0.93) vs FSMAX (0.43). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSMCX (30 years). GSMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMAX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. GSMCX (-0.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. GSMCX (15.20).
| FSMAX | GSMCX | FSMAX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.415 | 10.865 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.09B | 3,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.93 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | -0.34 | -2,103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 9.03 | 685% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | 15.20 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.92 | 33.76 | 352% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers