Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$25.03
Change+$0.26 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and FZAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. FZAMX (1.55B). FZAMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FZAMX (0.52) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. FZAMX (-1.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.96 vs. FZAMX (34.16).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.147 | 2.962 | 376% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.55B | 2,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.52 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.92 | -1.38 | -1,227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.41 | 36.36 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.96 | 34.16 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.30 | 40.90 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement