Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.98
Change-$0.80 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$24.24
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and FZAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. FZAMX (1.52B). FZAMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FZAMX (0.53) vs FSMAX (0.46). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. FZAMX (-0.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.64 vs. FZAMX (27.34).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | -0.165 | -3,946% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 1.52B | 2,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | -0.55 | -2,791% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.87 | 14.05 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.64 | 27.34 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.12 | 28.80 | 334% |