Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$26.34
Change+$1.39 (+5.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. FZAMX (1.67B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMAX (0.56) vs FZAMX (0.31). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. FZAMX (4.64). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. FZAMX (8.18).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.050 | 6.483 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6B | 1.67B | 2,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.31 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 4.64 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 22.19 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | 8.18 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.02 | 66.66 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement