Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.97
Change+$0.21 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$25.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and FZAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. FZAMX (1.6B). FZAMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FZAMX (0.50) vs FSMAX (0.43). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.83 vs. FZAMX (2.19). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.98 vs. FZAMX (9.93).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.072 | 3.620 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.6B | 2,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.50 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 2.19 | 494% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.22 | 28.19 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.98 | 9.93 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.01 | 40.18 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement