FSM
Price
$7.67
Change
+$0.05 (+0.66%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
HYMC
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.01 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
215.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs HYMC

Header iconFSM vs HYMC Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs HYMCBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$7.67
Change+$0.05 (+0.66%)
Volume$16.8M
Capitalization2.37B
Hycroft Mining Holding
Price$5.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
Volume$861.94K
Capitalization215.39M
FSM vs HYMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. HYMC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a StrongBuy and HYMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSM: $7.67 vs. HYMC: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: FSM and HYMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 133% vs. HYMC: 134%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $2.37B vs. HYMC: $215.39M
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.37B. HYMC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $215.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHYMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HYMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYMC is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HYMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than HYMC.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.39% price change this week, while HYMC (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($2.37B) has a higher market cap than HYMC($215M). HYMC YTD gains are higher at: 148.869 vs. FSM (78.788). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 564M vs. HYMC (-18.16M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 394M vs. HYMC (69.9M). HYMC has less debt than FSM: HYMC (131M) vs FSM (216M). FSM has higher revenues than HYMC: FSM (1.19B) vs HYMC (0).
FSMHYMCFSM / HYMC
Capitalization2.37B215M1,101%
EBITDA564M-18.16M-3,106%
Gain YTD78.788148.86953%
P/E Ratio13.95N/A-
Revenue1.19B0-
Total Cash394M69.9M564%
Total Debt216M131M165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs HYMC: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
HYMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
6899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (67) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HYMC (87) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HYMC (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HYMC (99) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HYMC’s over the last 12 months.

HYMC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (40) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HYMC’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

HYMC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSM (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HYMC’s stock grew significantly faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMHYMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBMJ0.090.01
+17.65%
Conservative Broadcast Media & Journalism Inc.
FBAK270.004.00
+1.50%
First National Bank Alaska
DCNSF8.33N/A
N/A
Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.
KBSTF11.82N/A
N/A
Kobe Steel, Ltd.
BLAGF0.47-0.01
-2.49%
Blue Lagoon Resources Inc.

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
+0.66%
CDE - FSM
74%
Closely correlated
+4.04%
IAG - FSM
71%
Closely correlated
+4.76%
NGD - FSM
69%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
KGC - FSM
68%
Closely correlated
+2.89%
WPM - FSM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More

HYMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYMC has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYMC jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYMC
1D Price
Change %
HYMC100%
-0.18%
CDE - HYMC
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.04%
PAAS - HYMC
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
SA - HYMC
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
FSM - HYMC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
AGI - HYMC
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
More