Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLTX vs GCRTX
FSLTX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 4.99B vs. FSLTX (2.61B). FSLTX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FSLTX (3.29) vs GCRTX (0.22). FSLTX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FSLTX (3 years) vs GCRTX (17 years). GCRTX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSLTX (1.72). GCRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 179.00 vs. FSLTX (106.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCRTX: FSLTX (0) vs GCRTX (1000). GCRTX (5.74) and FSLTX (5.74) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSLTX | GCRTX | FSLTX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.85 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.628 | 4.009 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 4.99B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 0.22 | 1,513% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.74 | 5.74 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 17.35 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 11.62 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement