Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMRX
FSLSX vs JVMRX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMRX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$60.66
Change+$3.78 (+6.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.89
Change-$0.82 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.73B
FSLSX vs JVMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. FSLSX (1.82B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than FSLSX: JVMRX (0.82) vs FSLSX (0.78). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMRX: FSLSX (42 years) vs JVMRX (14 years). FSLSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). FSLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. JVMRX (5.07). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. JVMRX (23.56).
| FSLSX | JVMRX | FSLSX / JVMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.74 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.75 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.810 | 5.208 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 24.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 5.07 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.11 | 12.07 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.07 | 23.56 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.24 | 80.03 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement