Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$56.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. FSLSX (1.72B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.73) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (42 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. FSLSX (-7.98). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.72 vs. JVMCX (40.87).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.85 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.674 | 8.893 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 23.9B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.98 | -6.45 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 21.60 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.72 | 40.87 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.52 | 38.46 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement