Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$205.73
Change+$1.02 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.74
Change+$0.12 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.44M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a StrongBuy and ICFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. ICFAX (31.4M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.65) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.20 vs. ICFAX (-2.60). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 169.07 vs. ICFAX (8.46).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.289 | 1.990 | 668% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 31.4M | 4,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.20 | -2.60 | -1,316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.89 | -3.37 | -3,228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 169.07 | 8.46 | 1,998% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.91 | 13.80 | 1,383% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement