Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$178.12
Change-$15.85 (-8.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.09
Change-$0.75 (-7.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.75M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and ICFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. ICFAX (27.8M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.68) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.17 vs. ICFAX (-5.71). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 99.23 vs. ICFAX (-18.84).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.592 | 0.553 | -288% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 27.8M | 4,187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | -5.71 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.80 | -7.62 | -798% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.23 | -18.84 | -527% |
| Returns for 10 years | 274.75 | 37.30 | 737% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement