Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$194.33
Change-$3.67 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$10.02
Change-$0.13 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.59M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. ICFAX (31.6M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.64) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.44 vs. ICFAX (-4.84). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 151.33 vs. ICFAX (4.27).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.011 | 4.921 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 31.6M | 4,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.44 | -4.84 | -546% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.66 | -1.09 | -8,257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.33 | 4.27 | 3,547% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.30 | 27.54 | 731% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement