Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$186.15
Change-$4.77 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.17M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. ICFAX (29.2M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.67) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. ICFAX (-11.92). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 129.60 vs. ICFAX (-2.87).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.134 | 2.932 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 29.2M | 4,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | -11.92 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.79 | -7.44 | -992% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.60 | -2.87 | -4,523% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.81 | 21.55 | 871% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement