Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$201.94
Change-$2.35 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.86
Change-$0.06 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.53M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. ICFAX (31.5M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.62) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.69 vs. ICFAX (-1.88). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 162.33 vs. ICFAX (4.97).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.518 | 3.874 | 323% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 31.5M | 4,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.69 | -1.88 | -1,846% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.42 | -7.89 | -1,044% |
| Returns for 5 years | 162.33 | 4.97 | 3,264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.43 | 16.57 | 1,131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement