Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$186.46
Change+$0.59 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.80
Change+$0.12 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.56M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. ICFAX (29.6M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.64) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. ICFAX (-10.99). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 132.76 vs. ICFAX (-1.31).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.678 | 2.618 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 29.6M | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | -10.99 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.44 | -2.87 | -3,251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.76 | -1.31 | -10,141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.85 | 22.96 | 849% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement