Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$195.31
Change-$1.51 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.4M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and ICFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. ICFAX (29.4M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.67) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. ICFAX (-5.57). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 118.98 vs. ICFAX (-14.39).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.383 | -4.084 | -205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 29.4M | 4,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | -5.57 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.31 | 0.66 | 13,545% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.98 | -14.39 | -827% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.76 | 14.79 | 1,486% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement