Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$201.94
Change-$2.35 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$24.97
Change-$0.30 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. HSSCX (49.9M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.62) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.92 vs. HSSCX (23.07). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 159.26 vs. HSSCX (21.26).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.202 | 10.194 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 49.9M | 2,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.92 | 23.07 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.93 | 5.38 | 1,485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 159.26 | 21.26 | 749% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.55 | -2.77 | -6,695% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement