Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$178.12
Change-$15.85 (-8.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$25.29
Change-$0.43 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.14M
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. HSSCX (48.1M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.68) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HSSCX (26 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. FSLBX (-2.17). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 99.23 vs. HSSCX (-26.70).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.592 | 0.119 | -1,341% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 48.1M | 2,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | 9.01 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.80 | 37.30 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.23 | -26.70 | -372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 274.75 | 12.44 | 2,208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement