Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$189.49
Change+$3.03 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$24.84
Change+$0.73 (+3.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and HSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. HSSCX (47.4M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.64) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. HSSCX (5.01). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 132.76 vs. HSSCX (10.81).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.678 | 6.399 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 47.4M | 2,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 5.01 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.44 | 27.99 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.76 | 10.81 | 1,228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.85 | -5.37 | -3,628% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement