Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$194.33
Change-$3.67 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$26.23
Change-$0.19 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.82M
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. HSSCX (51.8M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.64) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). FSLBX (26.44) and HSSCX (25.38) have marching annual gain over last year. FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 151.33 vs. HSSCX (28.93).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.011 | 15.755 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 51.8M | 2,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.44 | 25.38 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.66 | 31.07 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.33 | 28.93 | 523% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.30 | 6.27 | 3,212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement