Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$178.12
Change-$15.85 (-8.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$31.72
Change-$0.48 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.35M
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. HSSAX (47.4M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FSLBX (0.68) vs HSSAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HSSAX (29 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSAX (2000). HSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. FSLBX (-2.17). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 99.23 vs. HSSAX (-23.84).
| FSLBX | HSSAX | FSLBX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.592 | 0.190 | -840% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 47.4M | 2,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | 9.64 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.80 | 39.95 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.23 | -23.84 | -416% |
| Returns for 10 years | 274.75 | 25.33 | 1,085% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement