Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$194.33
Change-$3.67 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$32.82
Change-$0.24 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.82M
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. HSSAX (51.8M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FSLBX (0.64) vs HSSAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSAX (29 years). HSSAX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSAX (2000). FSLBX (26.44) and HSSAX (26.18) have marching annual gain over last year. FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 151.33 vs. HSSAX (34.01).
| FSLBX | HSSAX | FSLBX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.77 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.77 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.011 | 16.218 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 51.8M | 2,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.44 | 26.18 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.66 | 33.59 | 267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.33 | 34.01 | 445% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.30 | 18.45 | 1,091% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement