Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$186.46
Change+$0.59 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$30.19
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.28M
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and HSSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. HSSAX (47.3M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FSLBX (0.64) vs HSSAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSAX (29 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSAX (2000). HSSAX (5.67) and FSLBX (5.55) have marching annual gain over last year. FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 132.02 vs. HSSAX (15.16).
| FSLBX | HSSAX | FSLBX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.353 | 6.905 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 47.3M | 2,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 5.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.83 | 30.45 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.02 | 15.16 | 871% |
| Returns for 10 years | 193.92 | 5.50 | 3,523% |