Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKKX vs GCRTX
FSKKX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKKX vs. GCRTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKKX is a Buy and GCRTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. FSKKX (523M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FSKKX (5.56) vs GCRTX (0.21). FSKKX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FSKKX (12 years) vs GCRTX (17 years). FSKKX (3.00) is less costly to investors than GCRTX (1.94). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. GCRTX (179.00). FSKKX (1000) and GCRTX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GCRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. FSKKX (3.90). GCRTX return over 5 years is better than : 12.33 vs. FSKKX (6.39).
| FSKKX | GCRTX | FSKKX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.69 | 1.85 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.00 | 1.94 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.861 | 5.425 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 5.29B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.56 | 0.21 | 2,601% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 8.08 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.34 | 19.85 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.39 | 12.33 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.58 | 14.51 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers