Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs RPTIX
FSKGX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs RPTIX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6
Price$19.51
Change-$1.55 (-7.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.22M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$97.47
Change-$5.71 (-5.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
FSKGX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. RPTIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Hold and RPTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. FSKGX (958M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than FSKGX: RPTIX (0.11) vs FSKGX (0.02). FSKGX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: FSKGX (9 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). RPTIX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.45). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: FSKGX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). FSKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.71 vs. RPTIX (-5.74). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : 9.53 vs. RPTIX (-16.18).
| FSKGX | RPTIX | FSKGX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.63 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.63 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.777 | -0.123 | -632% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 958M | 25.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.11 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | -5.74 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.31 | 0.30 | 14,594% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.53 | -16.18 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.29 | - |