Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs RPMGX
FSKGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs RPMGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6
Price$20.60
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets872.17M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.21
Change+$0.33 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
FSKGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FSKGX (872M). FSKGX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: FSKGX (0.13) vs RPMGX (0.00). FSKGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FSKGX (8 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.45). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FSKGX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). FSKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.95 vs. RPMGX (-2.48). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. RPMGX (3.03).
| FSKGX | RPMGX | FSKGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.75 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.75 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.020 | 3.489 | 430% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 27.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.95 | -2.48 | -1,089% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.53 | 14.45 | 460% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.67 | 3.03 | 1,212% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement