FSK
Price
$18.13
Change
+$0.10 (+0.55%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.08B
63 days until earnings call
TPVG
Price
$6.83
Change
+$0.03 (+0.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
275.41M
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSK vs TPVG

Header iconFSK vs TPVG Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs TPVGBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$18.13
Change+$0.10 (+0.55%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization5.08B
TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC
Price$6.83
Change+$0.03 (+0.44%)
Volume$232.34K
Capitalization275.41M
FSK vs TPVG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPVG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. TPVG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and TPVG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $18.13 vs. TPVG: $6.83)
Brand notoriety: FSK and TPVG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 72% vs. TPVG: 68%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.08B vs. TPVG: $275.41M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.08B. TPVG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $275.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileTPVG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • TPVG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than TPVG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPVG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPVG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than TPVG.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while TPVG (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

TPVG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.08B) has a higher market cap than TPVG($275M). FSK has higher P/E ratio than TPVG: FSK (23.24) vs TPVG (6.63). TPVG YTD gains are higher at: 0.657 vs. FSK (-10.706). FSK has more cash in the bank: 472M vs. TPVG (24.9M). TPVG has less debt than FSK: TPVG (424M) vs FSK (8.04B). FSK has higher revenues than TPVG: FSK (315M) vs TPVG (53.5M).
FSKTPVGFSK / TPVG
Capitalization5.08B275M1,847%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.7060.657-1,629%
P/E Ratio23.246.63351%
Revenue315M53.5M589%
Total Cash472M24.9M1,896%
Total Debt8.04B424M1,896%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs TPVG: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
TPVG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2491
SMR RATING
1..100
1445
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as TPVG (8). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to TPVG’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TPVG (91). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than TPVG’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as TPVG (45). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to TPVG’s over the last 12 months.

TPVG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (64). This means that TPVG’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TPVG (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than TPVG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKTPVG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPVG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSDVF210.362.00
+0.96%
DSV A S
PGNT4.990.01
+0.22%
Paragon Technologies, Inc.
MPCB13.15N/A
N/A
Mountain Pacific Bancorp Inc.
VTSYF1.18N/A
N/A
Vitasoy International Holdings Ltd.
IMDZF133.20N/A
N/A
IMCD NV

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
+0.55%
MFIC - FSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
ARCC - FSK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
OBDC - FSK
72%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
BXSL - FSK
72%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
GBDC - FSK
72%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More

TPVG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPVG has been loosely correlated with TCPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPVG jumps, then TCPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPVG
1D Price
Change %
TPVG100%
+0.44%
TCPC - TPVG
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
FSK - TPVG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SLRC - TPVG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
TSLX - TPVG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
OCSL - TPVG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
More