FSK
Price
$14.84
Change
+$0.08 (+0.54%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.16B
18 days until earnings call
MFIC
Price
$11.68
Change
+$0.15 (+1.30%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSK vs MFIC

Header iconFSK vs MFIC Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs MFICBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$14.84
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
Volume$2.63M
Capitalization4.16B
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$11.68
Change+$0.15 (+1.30%)
Volume$747.76K
Capitalization1.09B
FSK vs MFIC Comparison Chart in %
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. MFIC commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and MFIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $14.84 vs. MFIC: $11.68)
Brand notoriety: FSK and MFIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 95% vs. MFIC: 169%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $4.16B vs. MFIC: $1.09B
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.16B. MFIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFIC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFIC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIC is a better buy in the long-term than FSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than MFIC.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.80% price change this week, while MFIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($4.16B) has a higher market cap than MFIC($1.09B). FSK has higher P/E ratio than MFIC: FSK (19.03) vs MFIC (11.12). MFIC YTD gains are higher at: -5.386 vs. FSK (-23.754). FSK has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. MFIC (16.5M). MFIC has less debt than FSK: MFIC (2.05B) vs FSK (8.04B). FSK has higher revenues than MFIC: FSK (315M) vs MFIC (109M).
FSKMFICFSK / MFIC
Capitalization4.16B1.09B381%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-23.754-5.386441%
P/E Ratio19.0311.12171%
Revenue315M109M289%
Total Cash312M16.5M1,891%
Total Debt8.04B2.05B392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs MFIC: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
MFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4723
SMR RATING
1..100
1432
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFIC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (4). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (47). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (32). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (86). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (15). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKMFIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVIZX12.730.06
+0.47%
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Index Inv
TRZZX60.120.10
+0.17%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Z
FALIX61.88N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap I
MSJAX19.42N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A
QICLX17.14-0.09
-0.52%
AQR International Multi-Style I

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
+0.54%
ARCC - FSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
MFIC - FSK
73%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
OBDC - FSK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
BXSL - FSK
72%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
GBDC - FSK
72%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More

MFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIC
1D Price
Change %
MFIC100%
+1.30%
OBDC - MFIC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
GBDC - MFIC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
ARCC - MFIC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
BCSF - MFIC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
SLRC - MFIC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
More