Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income R5
Price$27.98
Change-$0.14 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.7B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSIUX (3.7B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.48) vs RMEBX (1.09). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (20 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FSIUX (5.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. FSIUX (43.14).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.613 | 11.308 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.7B | 109B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.09 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 7.57 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.27 | 31.59 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.14 | 55.29 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.34 | 89.40 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement