Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs PCAFX
FSIDX vs PCAFX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs PCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Prospector Capital Appreciation
Price$23.62
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.15M
FSIDX vs PCAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. PCAFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Buy and PCAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. PCAFX (45.2M). FSIDX pays higher dividends than PCAFX: FSIDX (2.42) vs PCAFX (0.50). FSIDX was incepted earlier than PCAFX: FSIDX (22 years) vs PCAFX (18 years). PCAFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. PCAFX (30.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCAFX: FSIDX (0) vs PCAFX (10000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. PCAFX (5.17). PCAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.55 vs. FSIDX (36.35).
| FSIDX | PCAFX | FSIDX / PCAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.344 | 6.781 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 45.2M | 11,522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 0.50 | 482% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 5.17 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 21.07 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 38.55 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.68 | 57.39 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement