Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs LMCMX
FSIDX vs LMCMX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs LMCMX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income IS
Price$8.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FSIDX vs LMCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. LMCMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Buy and LMCMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LMCMX (175M). LMCMX pays higher dividends than FSIDX: LMCMX (5.55) vs FSIDX (2.42). FSIDX was incepted earlier than LMCMX: FSIDX (22 years) vs LMCMX (11 years). LMCMX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). LMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSIDX (36.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCMX: FSIDX (0) vs LMCMX (1000000). LMCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. FSIDX (8.86). LMCMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.10 vs. FSIDX (36.35).
| FSIDX | LMCMX | FSIDX / LMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.344 | 6.565 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 5.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 16.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 56.44 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 89.10 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.68 | 83.44 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers