Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs LMCLX
FSIDX vs LMCLX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs LMCLX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income I
Price$8.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FSIDX vs LMCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. LMCLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Buy and LMCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LMCLX (175M). LMCLX pays higher dividends than FSIDX: LMCLX (5.35) vs FSIDX (2.42). FSIDX was incepted earlier than LMCLX: FSIDX (22 years) vs LMCLX (11 years). LMCLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). LMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSIDX (36.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCLX: FSIDX (0) vs LMCLX (1000000). LMCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.33 vs. FSIDX (8.86). LMCLX return over 5 years is better than : 88.82 vs. FSIDX (36.35).
| FSIDX | LMCLX | FSIDX / LMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.344 | 6.588 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 5.35 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 16.33 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 56.39 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 88.82 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.68 | 82.49 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers