Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs LMCKX
FSIDX vs LMCKX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs LMCKX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income FI
Price$9.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FSIDX vs LMCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. LMCKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Buy and LMCKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LMCKX (175M). LMCKX pays higher dividends than FSIDX: LMCKX (4.64) vs FSIDX (2.42). FSIDX was incepted earlier than LMCKX: FSIDX (22 years) vs LMCKX (11 years). LMCKX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). LMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSIDX (36.00). FSIDX (0) and LMCKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. FSIDX (8.86). LMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 85.98 vs. FSIDX (36.35).
| FSIDX | LMCKX | FSIDX / LMCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.32 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.47 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.344 | 6.362 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 4.64 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 16.01 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 54.86 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 85.98 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.68 | 78.11 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers