Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs LCMNX
FSIDX vs LCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs LCMNX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income C
Price$9.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FSIDX vs LCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. LCMNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Buy and LCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LCMNX (175M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than FSIDX: LCMNX (3.59) vs FSIDX (2.42). FSIDX was incepted earlier than LCMNX: FSIDX (22 years) vs LCMNX (11 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). LCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSIDX (36.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: FSIDX (0) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. FSIDX (8.73). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 80.78 vs. FSIDX (36.19).
| FSIDX | LCMNX | FSIDX / LCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.98 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.13 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.223 | 6.055 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 3.59 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 15.17 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 52.08 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.19 | 80.78 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.51 | 67.77 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement