FSHP
Price
$10.90
Change
+$0.08 (+0.74%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
54.78M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MACIU
Price
$10.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSHP vs MACIU

Header iconFSHP vs MACIU Comparison
Open Charts FSHP vs MACIUBanner chart's image
Flag Ship Acquisition
Price$10.90
Change+$0.08 (+0.74%)
Volume$3.82K
Capitalization54.78M
Melar Acquisition Corp. I
Price$10.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FSHP vs MACIU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSHP vs. MACIU commentary
Feb 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHP is a Hold and MACIU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 09, 2026
Stock price -- (FSHP: $10.90 vs. MACIU: $10.90)
Brand notoriety: FSHP and MACIU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSHP: 194% vs. MACIU: 77%
Market capitalization -- FSHP: $54.78M vs. MACIU: $0
FSHP [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $54.78M. MACIU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $207.15M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSHP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMACIU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSHP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MACIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSHP and MACIU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

FSHP (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while MACIU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.96% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHP YTD gains are higher at: 1.395 vs. MACIU (1.019). MACIU has more cash in the bank: 286K vs. FSHP (18.8K). FSHP has less debt than MACIU: FSHP (1.17M) vs MACIU (3.56M).
FSHPMACIUFSHP / MACIU
Capitalization54.8MN/A-
EBITDA-883.83KN/A-
Gain YTD1.3951.019137%
P/E Ratio41.92N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash18.8K286K7%
Total Debt1.17M3.56M33%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MACIU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXJ37.561.75
+4.89%
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF
GEM45.761.22
+2.75%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® EMkts Eq ETF
JANU28.400.40
+1.44%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF
DMX50.560.15
+0.30%
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
BNY10.200.02
+0.21%
BlackRock New York Municipal Income Trust

FSHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSHP and POLE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSHP and POLE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSHP
1D Price
Change %
FSHP100%
N/A
POLE - FSHP
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJK - FSHP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
DTSQ - FSHP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
ASPCU - FSHP
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
AFJKU - FSHP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MACIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MACIU has been loosely correlated with DSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MACIU jumps, then DSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACIU
1D Price
Change %
MACIU100%
N/A
DSAC - MACIU
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
CAPNU - MACIU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSHP - MACIU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACI - MACIU
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
PCSC - MACIU
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More