Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. FSHCX (913M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.59) vs SHSAX (0.20). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (39 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.84 vs. FSHCX (-17.97). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.25 vs. FSHCX (-14.34).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.516 | 9.209 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 913M | 6.68B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.20 | 299% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.97 | -1.84 | 978% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.87 | 1.85 | -1,290% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.34 | -8.25 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.58 | 29.32 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement