Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs PRHSX
FSHCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSHCX (971M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FSHCX (0.61) vs PRHSX (0.01). FSHCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FSHCX (39 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). PRHSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. PRHSX (52.40). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FSHCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). PRHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -19.96 vs. FSHCX (-29.98). PRHSX return over 5 years is better than : -13.14 vs. FSHCX (-15.31).
| FSHCX | PRHSX | FSHCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.035 | -1.999 | 502% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 11.2B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.01 | 6,859% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.98 | -19.96 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.76 | -12.58 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.31 | -13.14 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.35 | -7.05 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement