Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs PRHSX
FSHCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSHCX (883M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FSHCX (0.64) vs PRHSX (0.01). FSHCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FSHCX (39 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). PRHSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. PRHSX (52.40). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FSHCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). PRHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -19.37 vs. FSHCX (-25.75). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -7.97 vs. PRHSX (-8.85).
| FSHCX | PRHSX | FSHCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.326 | 1.534 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 883M | 11.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.01 | 7,333% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.75 | -19.37 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.87 | -7.05 | 353% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.97 | -8.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.87 | 2.05 | 676% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement