Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs JNGLX
FSHCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. FSHCX (913M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FSHCX (0.59) vs JNGLX (0.28). FSHCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FSHCX (39 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FSHCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. FSHCX (-17.97). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 14.98 vs. FSHCX (-14.34).
| FSHCX | JNGLX | FSHCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.516 | 22.802 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 913M | 4.95B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.28 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.97 | 8.87 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.87 | 22.34 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.34 | 14.98 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.58 | 53.31 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement